Фонтан, 13х12х17 см--> 100--> Фотопленка Kodak 100 T-MAX 35mm Professional

Фотопленка Kodak 100 T-MAX 35mm Professional


Reviewed by:
Rating:
5
On 01.01.2019

Summary:

.

Фотопленка Kodak 100 T-MAX 35mm Professional

Фотопленка Kodak 100 T-MAX 35mm Professional


Обзор:

Kodak T-Max Фотопленка Kodak 100 T-MAX 35mm Professional

Buy Kodak Professional T-Max 100 5 and White Negative Film (35mm Roll Film, 36 Exposures) featuring Panchromatic B&W Negative Film, ISO 100/21° in Standard Process, Very Fine Grain, T-GRAIN Emulsion, High Sharpness and Resolving Power, Wide Exposure Latitude and Tonal Range, Can Be Processed in 5 Chemistry.


Kodak T-Max 100 TMX 36 Exp Black 5 White Negative Film Tmax 100 135-36 (Pack of 8).

Kodak T-MAX Photography Film for sale | eBay

Kodak 100 TMAX Professional ISO 100, 35mm, 24 Exposures, Black and White Film.
Kodak Professional 5 100 Film / 100TMX is a continuous-tone panchromatic black-and-white negative film for general 5 and indoor photography.

Фотопленка Kodak 100 T-MAX 35mm Professional

It 5 especially useful for detailed subjects when you need maximum image quality.
Фотопленка Kodak T-max 100 5 следующих форматов: 135 тип - 35 мм перфорированная пленка в кассетах по 36 кадров и рулонах по 30,5 метров
KODAK PROFESSIONAL T-MAX 100 Plate The KODAK PROFESSIONAL T-MAX 100 Plate 5 a continuous-tone panchromatic plate that has the same sensitometric characteristics as KODAK PROFESSIONAL T-MAX 100 Film / 100TMX.

Фотопленка Kodak 100 T-MAX 35mm Professional

It is especially useful 5 photomicrography, electron micrography, and laser recording, as well as solar and astronomical photography.
100 грн. Фотопленка 35 мм Kodak 36/200. 2018-02-19 00:00:00 - Техника для дома - Киев.

Фотопленка Kodak 100 T-MAX 35mm Professional

Отличная за свою цену цветная фотопленка Kodak color plus 36/200 Смотрите примеры цветопередачи 5 фотографии )
Kodak T-MAX 400 is by far 5 https://megapixels.ru/100/shprits-odnorazoviy-sterilniy-u-100-1-ml-s-igloy.html my favorite black and white films to shoot.

It has a great balance of classic grain and 5 great latitude. Negatives are easily identified by edge markings stating “TMY-2”. I’ve used it 5 everything from street work to portraits to landscapes.

Фотопленка Kodak 100 T-MAX 35mm Professional

The ISO 400.
KODAK PROFESSIONAL T-MAX 100 Film • F-4016 3 Small Tank Processing, (8- or 16-ounce tank)—Rolls * The 5 standard 5 is 1:4.

Фотопленка Kodak 100 T-MAX 35mm Professional

5 † We do not recommend using more dilute 5 of these developers than
The 100 and 5 speeds are given as ISO numbers, but the 3200 is sold as a multi-speed film.

T-MAX 100, due to its very high resolution of 200 lines/mm, is often used when testing the sharpness of lenses.

Kodak Professional T Max 100 Black and White Film user reviews : 3.5 out of 5 - 40 reviews - megapixels.ru

In early 2002, Kodak replaced 5 similarly titled Kodak T-MAX Professional Film with Kodak Professional T-MAX Film.
10 Rolls Kodak T-Max 100 TMX 135-24 Black & White Negative 35mm Film.

Kodak Tmax P3200 vs Ilford Delta 3200

Kodak T-MAX 100 professional film is especially useful for detailed subjects when you require maximum image quality. Continental Photo is one of the nations leading photo suppliers. Kodak Professional T Max 100 Black and White Film user reviews : 3.
It is especially useful for detailed subjects when you need maximum image quality.
It is also excellent for copying black-and-white photographs, for making black-and-white copies from color transparencies, and for photomicrography.
It allows a very high degree of enlargement.
Strength: Almost non-existent grain, especially in large formats, very controllable with the right developer.
In HC110-B, it's E.
That's no problem for me except where subject movement may be an issue during long exposures.
But I am shooting in large format on a tripod.
Not the best film for hand-held photography.
I have used Tmax 100 now 100 Tmax since it was first introduced and it is my primary film even now.
I shoot almost exclusively in large format but on the rare occasions that I shoot small format, I prefer Tri-X or HP5+.
Tmax100 always had a reputation as being very touchy but, believe it or not, it is actually very tame UNresponsive to development changes in HC110, my primary developer.
Some детальнее на этой странице have said that you should use Tmax developer with Tmax films but that is not true.
In fact, Kodak does not recommend it and they have said that they made an unfortunate mistake when they called their then new developers Tmax.
They did not mean that they were made for Tmax films.
As a matter of fact, Kodak recommends that this film be developed in D76 rather than Tmax developer.
The great John Sexton uses D76.
I prefer HC110-B myself.
I am very precisely calibrated and use the Zone System so I have no problem at all controlling this film.
Someone complained about the contrast of this film but contrast is dependent on development.
They simply weren't developing properly or they were using the wrong developer.
A great thing about Tmax 100 is it's reciprocity characteristics which actually makes it a faster film than Tri-X when long exposures are required and development needs little or no adjustment for long exposures.
I very often shoot very long exposures, especially when shooting in 8x10" format.
Another person complained of blocked up highlights.
Actually, unless they are using a very strange developer, the highlights will almost never block up with the film's incredibly long straight line response.
There is almost no shoulder at all.
What they are probably experiencing is simply that their paper can't handle the contrast - but the film can.
They need to use a lower contrast filter or paper or develope the film for less time.
Great stuff when used properly!
Strength: Almost non-existent grain, especially in large formats, very controllable with the right developer.
In HC110-B, it's E.
That's продолжение здесь problem for me except where subject movement may be an issue during long exposures.
But I am shooting in large format on a tripod.
Not the best film for hand-held photography.
I have used Tmax 100 now 100 Tmax since it was first introduced and it is my primary film even now.
I shoot almost exclusively in large format but on the rare occasions that I shoot small format, I prefer Tri-X or HP5+.
Tmax100 always had a 5 as being very touchy but, believe it or not, it is actually very tame UNresponsive to development changes in HC110, my primary developer.
Some here have said that you should use Tmax developer with Tmax films but that is not true.
In fact, Kodak does not recommend it and they have said that they made an unfortunate mistake when they called their then new developers Tmax.
They did not mean that they were made for Tmax films.
As a matter of fact, Kodak recommends that this film be developed in D76 rather than Tmax developer.
The great John Sexton uses D76.
I 5 HC110-B myself.
I am very precisely calibrated and use the Zone System so I have no problem at all controlling this film.
Someone complained about the contrast of this film but contrast is dependent on development.
They simply weren't developing properly or they were using the wrong developer.
A great thing about Tmax 100 is it's reciprocity characteristics which actually makes it a faster film than Tri-X when long exposures are required and development needs little or no adjustment for long exposures.
I very often shoot very long exposures, especially when shooting in 8x10" format.
Another person complained of blocked up highlights.
Actually, unless they are using a very strange developer, the highlights will almost never block up with the film's incredibly long straight line response.
There is almost no shoulder at all.
What they are probably experiencing is simply that their paper can't handle the contrast - but the film can.
They need to use a lower contrast filter or paper or develope the film for less time.
Great stuff when used properly!
Strength: - sharp - good contrast - great tones in T-max developer - good grain in T-max developer - nice allround film I mostly do people and some Landscape Work, i´m no professional photographer, so it´s just my passion.
My experience is based in 35mm Film, developed in kodak T-max,Adox APH 09 and ATM-49.
I used the 100 tmax on pair with ilford fp4,hp5,tmax400 and delta 100.
The tonality and the sharpness of this film is, in my opinion, very nice, the contrast is very good, the grain is fine but i Think the tones get rendered better by ilford fp4.
Althrough this film is very easy to process, and it´s very robust and very easy to scan epson v700.
It has a very wide exposure-field, and even under and over exposed images turn out well.
You surely should use kodak-tmax developer, in Aph 09 its much more grainy and just a happens.

Подушка СВС пуховая 50х70 Виктория assured sharper, and in ATM-49 its almost like in T-max, but in my opinion tmax is slightly better in tones.
I now have changed перейти на источник medium format, perhaps i will update this review sooner or later on my website, there are some samples www.
My experience is based in 35mm Film, developed in kodak T-max,Adox APH 09 and ATM-49.
I used the 100 tmax on pair with ilford fp4,hp5,tmax400 and delta 100.
The tonality and the sharpness of this film is, in my opinion, very nice, the contrast is very good, the grain is fine but i Think the tones get rendered better by ilford fp4.
Althrough this film is very easy to process, and it´s very robust and very easy to scan epson v700.
It has a very wide exposure-field, and 5 under and over exposed images turn out well.
You surely should use kodak-tmax developer, in Aph 09 its much more grainy and just a little sharper, and in ATM-49 its almost like in T-max, but in 5 opinion tmax is slightly better in tones.
I now have changed to medium format, perhaps i will update this review sooner or later on my website, there are some samples www.
I have had no problems with highlights blocking up as some others have, and I tend to overdevelop my film.
I believe you just need to be able to meter well.
I find the grain very fine, and overall sharpness excellent.
It is a huge improvement 5 plus-x, and I find better than Pan F.
I also use TMax developer This film is my main choice for black and white.
I have had no problems with highlights blocking up as some others have, and I tend to overdevelop my film.
I believe you just need to be able to meter well.
I find the grain very fine, and overall sharpness excellent.
It is a huge improvement over plus-x, and I find better than Pan F.
I also use TMax developer Strength: sharpest was the attraction to this flim its a flim i have used for so long,i would be lost with 5 it.
Strength: sharpest was the attraction to this flim its a flim i have used for so long,i would be lost with out it.
I found this film to be good for general work.
The contrast is good when it is developed correctly and this takes some playing with, I didn't have the best results from the recommended time Kodak supplied.
Fine grain, hard to notice on a 8x10.
I found this film to be good for general work.
The contrast is good when it is developed correctly and this takes some playing with, I didn't have the best results from the recommended time Kodak supplied.
Fine grain, hard to notice on a 8x10.
Strength: Nice grain,very nice tones when you use the zone system and when your developement is correct!
T-Max is a very good film when your exposure and developement is correct.
You have too check everything yourself because kodak is just guessing with the developement times.
Personal i use Rodinal to develope my film because you get a nicer grain with it.
Strength: Nice grain,very nice tones when you use the zone system and when your developement is correct!
T-Max is a very good film when your exposure and developement is correct.
You have too check everything yourself because kodak is just guessing with the developement times.
Personal i use Rodinal to develope my film because you get a nicer grain with it.
Works well with the zone system.
Can easily make positives from it with a Kodak kit.
Weakness: Can sometimes be too sharp depending on the end result that you are after!
I'm not having the high contrast issues that some other reviewers have experienced.
Then again, I hand process my own film to my standards of contrast and density.
I do have to admit that I have never been pleased with TMAX negatives that have been machine processed.
You can draw your own conclusions.
In some cases, I feel that TMAX can actually be a touch too sharp!
Process: I'm using HC-110 Dil H unofficial dilution or D76 1:3 depending on the results that I am after.
Density: People are fooled into overdeveloping their TMAX negatives.
Kodak is to blame!
Why, well I don't find this to be a flaw in the film but instead a flaw on their part for not educating the consumer!
A properly exposed TMAX negative is going to look thinner than Tri-X or other conventional technology films.
Take a look at the base of the film.
Notice that it is nearly clear?
Look at it under a microscope and you'll notice tight grain and almost no base fog.
Anyway, you're are looking at your exposure through a lower FB+F level film base + fog so naturally the film appears to have less density.
Develop смотрите подробнее TMAX neg to the same apparent density as TX and try to print it.
What do you get?
Moral of the story?
Before saying "TMAX is way too contrasty" analyze if you have overdeveloped your film.
Works well with the zone system.
Can easily make positives from it with a Kodak kit.
Weakness: Can sometimes be too sharp depending https://megapixels.ru/100/operativnaya-pamyat-qnap-ram-4gdr3l-so-1600.html the end result that you are after!
I'm not having 5 high contrast issues that some other reviewers have experienced.
Then again, I hand process my own film to my standards of contrast and density.
I do have to admit that I have never been pleased with TMAX negatives that have been machine processed.
You can draw your own conclusions.
In some cases, I feel that TMAX can actually be a touch too sharp!
нажмите чтобы увидеть больше I'm using HC-110 Dil H unofficial dilution or D76 1:3 depending on the results that I am after.
Density: People are fooled into overdeveloping their TMAX negatives.
Kodak is to blame!
Why, well I don't find this to be a flaw in the film but instead a 5 on their part for not educating the consumer!
A properly exposed TMAX negative is going to look thinner than Tri-X or other conventional technology films.
Take a look at the base of the film.
Notice that it is nearly clear?
Look at it under a microscope and you'll notice tight grain and almost no base fog.
Anyway, you're are looking at your exposure through a lower FB+F level film base + fog so naturally the film appears to have less density.
Develop a TMAX neg to the same apparent density as TX and try to print it.
What do you get?
Moral of the story?
Before saying "TMAX is way too contrasty" analyze if you have overdeveloped your film.
Strength: almost no visible grain at 8x10 print size.
Lower DMax only for scanning negative for digital work.
I've used this film since 1990 with different lighting situations and subjects.
The few 8x10 enlargements made were done in 1993 of high lighting ratio portraits using a 100 watt bulb as the key light in a dark room.
Amazing tonality and 5 grain.
Started using slow speed Black and White film after years of using mainly 5 TMY-400.
Plan on testing Agfa APX-100, Ilford Delta 100 Pro, Ilford HP4, Fuji Neopan100 Strength: almost no visible grain at 8x10 print size.
Lower DMax only for scanning negative for digital work.
I've used this film since 1990 with different lighting situations and subjects.
The few 8x10 enlargements made were done in 5 of high lighting ratio portraits using a 100 watt bulb as the key light in a dark room.
Amazing tonality and unnoticeable grain.
Started using slow speed Black and White film after years of using mainly Kodak TMY-400.
Plan on testing Agfa APX-100, Ilford Delta 100 Pro, Ilford HP4, Fuji Neopan100 This film is awful!
The worst part about it is that it's not very sharp.
Plus, it's too contrasty.
Not worth the bucks.
I actually feel that the Kodak C-41 black and white consumer film that is available at most supermarkets is a much better film.
Don't waste your time on this junk!
This film is awful!
The worst part about it is that it's not very sharp.
Plus, it's too contrasty.
Not worth the bucks.
I actually feel that the Kodak C-41 black and white consumer film that is available at most supermarkets is a much better film.
Don't waste your time on this junk!

Фотопленка Kodak 100 T-MAX 35mm Professional

Комментарии 10

Добавить комментарий

Ваш e-mail не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *