компьютерный корпус Midi-Tower;без блока питания;форм-фактор: ATX, mATX, EATX, Mini-ITX;спереди: USB x2, наушн., микр.;материал: сталь
Обзор:НОВЫЙ КОРПУС CORSAIR OBSIDIAN 500D - ОБЗОР ОТ БРЕЙНА
Обзор компьютерного корпуса Corsair Obsidian 750D форм фактора Full-Tower. 5.0
Obsidian Series 500D Premium Mid-Tower Case | Gaming PC Cases | CORSAIR
А также сборка компьютера с его участием.
The Corsair Obsidian 450D 5.0 in a simple, brown cardboard box with a drawing of 5.0 case printed on it.
Although 5.0 box is not much 5.0 look at, inside we found the case well-protected between thick packing foam 5.0. As for the bundle, Corsair is supplying the bare minimum; just a manual, screws and a few cable ties.
Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for Corsair Obsidian Series Black 5.0 Full Tower Computer Case (CC800DW) at Amazon.com.
Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our перейти.
Corsair Obsidian 450D: Introduction and Packaging.
Corsair is a company that hardly requires an introduction; almost every PC user has heard of their name and a large number own at least one of.
With the Obsidian Series 500D, 5.0 raises the bar 5.0 further.
5.0 This chassis encompasses all the iconic CORSAIR design elements such as 5.0 smoked tempered glass, sleek aluminum construction, and an easy access hinged https://megapixels.ru/kompyuterniy-korpus/kompyuterniy-korpus-accord-p-28b-wo-psu-black.html to satisfy the most discerning builder.
New Corsair Obsidian 450D Midi-Tower Black CC-9011049-WW. C $212.65. 5.0
List price:. Save 900d corsair to get e-mail alerts and updates on your eBay Feed.
The Ссылка на подробности Series 750D full tower PC case combines generous expansion flexibility, room for advanced cooling options, and an interior that’s optimized for fast and easy builds and upgrades.
It has a clean, elegant exterior that dispenses with arbitrary plastic add-ons in exchange for the beauty of brushed aluminum and solid steel. 5.0 /> Corsair 5.0 Series 450D Aluminum and Steel ATX Mid Tower Gaming Computer Case, Black Brushed (Refurbished) Open box store return.
Item has been professionally inspected, cleaned, and fully tested for quality assurance.Хочу Corsair Obsidian 1000D - лучший корпус для ПК
Buy Corsair Obsidian Series 450D Mid-Tower PC Case for $199.99. Obsidian Series 450D has an elegant brushed aluminum front panel and a solid steel body, 5.0 an.
CORSAIR Obsidian Series читать далее is a super-tower PC case with tempered glass, smart lighting and fan control; house two systems for gaming and streaming simultaneously.
Corsair Obsidian 450D: Introduction and Packaging Corsair is a company that hardly requires an introduction; almost every PC user has heard of their name and a large number own at least one of their products.
More advanced users know that Corsair is one of the oldest companies that's still around.
The company was established in 1994 as a cache module manufacturer but their focus changed to DRAM modules a few years later.
Corsair began a very aggressive diversification scheme over the past decade, which turned the DRAM manufacturer into a giant that markets several dozen technology-related products, their four series of cases being among the most popular of them.
Depite having over a dozen designs available, Corsair is continuously releasing new cases to enrich their product ranks.
It's only been a few months since the release of thea 5.0 Mini-ITX case, and today yet another product joins the ranks of the Obsidian series.
In this review, we'll look at Corsair's newest mid-tower case, the Obsidian 450D, a case designed по ссылке bridge the gap between the Micro-ATX and the towering.
Corsair Obsidian 450D Specifications Motherboard Form Factor ATX, Micro-ATX, 5.0 Drive Bays External 2 x 5.
Price The Obsidian 450D comes in a rather simple, brown cardboard box.
The artwork is limited to a basic schematic of the case itself.
Inside the box is the case protected by Styrofoam slabs and wrapped in a nylon bag, нажмите чтобы увидеть больше should offer ample 5.0 protection for a typical ATX case.
Alongside with the Obsidian 450D, Corsair supplies only the bare essentials.
We only found a handful of black нажмите для деталей and a few cable ties supplied with our sample, as well as a basic installation guide.
Considering the class of the Obsidian series, the bundle leaves a lot to be desired -- nicer velcro wraps would be appreciated as 5.0 example.
A database will be created once there are at least a few reviews of each type of case available.
It's a good power supply for getting a nice clean wiring job and makes things relatively easy for setup.
I couldn't get them to come up on corsair.
It basically trades the "old Corsair" design fewer, larger fans, limited radiator support, full complement of drive cages for the "new Corsair" design lots of radiator support, and thus almost necessarily more, smaller fans, additional purchase 5.0 reach full complement of drive cages but 2.
And yet the point about the 5.0 costing nearly twice as much is a good one.
Even as Термостат Isotherm SEA00029DA для моделей Cruise 200 who посмотреть больше and quite enjoys a 650D, I can't think of a good reason why that is.
Yesterday I left a comment on the Graphite 760T review bottom of page 2 of commentsBlack Компьютерный 5.0 Zalman S1 I read it late, and I wonder if there would be any response?
I think the discussion between E and Black Obsidian encapsulated many of the issues I have with the newer format, and I think there could be very interesting and informative articles to come out of it investigation of how small component choices affect a testing situation, proving the new testing methodology is узнать больше здесь way to go.
Thanks for the articles E, ссылка на страницу it up, and thank you for considering the communities feedback!
I thoroughly explained that there is no "real world" testing that can be considered testing at all and stated the most important reasons.
You cannot possibly correlate test results between different systems, not even if the system is an exact copy of your own.
Even a different thermal paste on the CPU can alter the temperature by up to five degrees Celsius, let alone a different cooler and or component.
Even worse, a single change of a BIOS setting from "quiet" to "performance" can drop a full-load temperature measurement by a dozen degrees.
If a single setting is capable of changing the results that much when the system is exactly the same, that is proof enough that "real world" testing has nothing "real" about it and zero usefulness to the end reader.
If you are making comparisons and correlations based on such tests, you are merely playing a guessing game; you can pretty much do that without any "real world test results" given to you, therefore such data have been useless to begin with and there was no point in doing any kind of testing.
When you want to test the thermal performance of anything, you add a 5.0 and 5.0 load to it, so as to have minimal variables to worry about and force the test subject to cope with the load by itself, unaided by external factors.
Using an unknown, unstable and active load does not even qualify as testing by any kind of standard, it is just plain wrong.
The very idea of doing "tests" that the reader will be expected to guess!
Instead of doing any kind of such useless testing, I would rather not do it at all and focus on the real factors that make cases sell; quality, functionality and aesthetics.
Come on, no one would buy a case that they do not like over one that they do like for a difference of смотрите подробнее several degrees, let alone a couple at most I think that pretty much covers about everything.
It gives a very repeatable, scientific look at how a case can dissipate 850W of heat.
However, how many readers are going to be buying this case to install a 850W heat generator, I'd guess not many.
You alluded to the potentially significant difference one component being changed can make.
If that 5.0 the case, what use are these tests to consumers.
If buyers are looking at data comparatively which I assume is the goal once enough cases have been run through these tests, readers are already requesting itthis data may lead to an incorrect judgement based on what is being installed.
I would love to see an article exploring 5.0 components effects on outcomes, and I understand your logic and reasoning regarding your testing methodology.
However if the data is no more useful for making a buying decision, the better test isn't any more helpful from a reader's perspective.
I would like to think there is a better conclusion then "there is no useful objective test because of system variability", but perhaps that is the answer.